Post
a reflection on this chapter, How Should Education Be Reformed? - 2-3
paragraphs
The authors of the text book
maintains: “Some educators and politicians argue that much more needs to be
done to improve U.S. schools, given that the reforms implemented to date have
not led to significant gains in academic achievement. Others disagree, stating
that U.S. schools are a great social achievement, educating more children to
higher levels than the schools supported by any other society in the world. A
number of skeptics believe that the schools-and particularly the public
schools-are incapable of being reformed.” I personally disagree with the
skeptics, for the simple reason that I myself needed intervention to equalize
my chances for academic success. Were it not for that intervention, that being,
differentiated learning, I would not have achieved the level of academic
success I am now enjoying.
Accordingly, from my past
experiences and vantage point, I believe differentiated learning should be
mandatory for failing students. Presently, only a handful of schools are using
this concept and they are experiencing greater success in comparison with
standardized methods.
Ultimately, it is worth noting what
a leading expert on school reform, David Kerbow, concluded in his book entitled
Patterns of Urban Student Mobility and Local School Reform: “As students transfer, and
mobile students forfeit the benefit of continuity of school services ... it has
deep (though often hidden) consequences for the schools these students attend
and for the systemic changes intended by local school reform” (Kerbow 147-169).
Work Cited
Kerbow, David. "Patterns of
Urban Student Mobility and Local School Reform." Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR)
. 1.2 (2009): 147-169. Print. <http://www.tandfonline.com/>.
No comments:
Post a Comment